egghelp/eggheads community

Move this line: above this line: and under }.

Try with:

You might want to check your last if statements cos something doesn't feel right in there.

I think it's safe to remove the [onchan $nick $enforcechan] && [onchan $::botnick $enforcechan] part as the previous two checks validate them as well, meaning botisop can't return true unless bot is on the channel and the isop can't return true if nick isn't on the channel. You set the chan ...

Look at the bind statement and take it from there. If i where to guess, he asked ChatGTP to make this piece of code.

Open a shell on the Debian server and then type tclsh , and then package require ip and reply back with what it says. I have Debian 11: cezar@ax41:~$ cat /etc/os-release PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" and works: cezar@ax41:~$ tclsh % package require ip 1.4 If this fails, you ...

I mentioned the IP package (comes with TCLlib) before (link), that offers some tools to validate IP v4 or v6.

Fixed typos above as I did a copy/paste and forgot to replace some variables.

Here's two options: scan and string is integer . bind pub - [cmdchar]c2f pub_c2f proc pub_c2f {nick uhost hand chan rest} { set data [lindex $rest 0] if {![isnum $data]} {putserv "PRIVMSG $nick :Calling syntax is ${cmdchar_}c2f <tempeture in celsius>" return 1} set cdata [expr $data * 1.8 ...

I copied the restoday as it was and didn't pay much attention to it. Today Fire asked me to have a look at an error he was getting and noticed that the time function had 4 arguments, while it expects 5 space separated integers of the form of "minute hour day month year". To fix this replac...

And why don't you add the bug report as instructed by the message?

Saw your code and added the 'nick change' he asked, made a few changes here and there. To name a few.. 1. Replaced [list ... ] with { .. }. From the point of view of the compiler it makes no difference, but for user it's easier to see a difference between: set replies(cola) [list "Serves icecol...

After a bit of consideration, I decided to put things to a test. The rand command (that comes with eggdrop) outputs a random value from the given LIMIT, of 0 up to LIMIT-1, thus, giving it a limit of 5, it can output the values 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. % set fg_colors "01 02 05 06 10 12" 01 02 05 06...

Given that the rand that's implemented in eggdrop returns a random integer between 0 and limit-1, for example a [rand 10] would pick a random number from position 0 (in our case 1) up to limit (in our case it's 10) - 1, so last element will be 9, this means at least in theory, 10 will never be picke...

The command is !ginfo ip not !test ip, unless you changed the command from !ginfo to !test.