egghelp/eggheads community

You mean the topic or text of a channel window? That is down to the client you are using. If you are using mIRC, according to there forums, this has been requested a few times, and people don't like the idea. However, there are quite a few threads on the mIRC forums, showing scripts that can be used...

-> Take this "I sprayed some grafiti with permission onto a wall next door. Because of that, I now own the wall". Dream on. i can't own the wall,because its not mine. but i can ask that my work will be recognized in some way. 100% correct. You can be recognised for running a sucesful comu...

--> Yes I would let sombody take my channel if they would thing they are strong enough you are not right. u seem to invite lamers to get your chan. is it a challenge ? u know very well that your channel could be tookover easily and in a little time. if u play with the fire,probably the fire will bu...

HMM. Well, you analogy is incorrect. IRC is a service, not a right. You do not own a channel like you own a home, you are simply squattig in the channel yourself. Bots are there to aid the protection. Yes I would let sombody take my channel if they would thing they are strong enough. Why would I? Be...

But you can change channel.

Do the sensibe thing as we all do.

However, after reading and experimenting with eggdrop, there is little people can do without hacking our bots, which is a threat to most people.

Granted, that reply was a bit harsh, but the stance is still the same.

We do not aid with information or other help in t.o of channels. That is a simple fact.

Be it for good or bad purposes, we can't judge, so won't judge. You can't bend a rule just for one person.

In the source code of the bot, if the return code from the PUB bind trigger, say it was sucessful in triggering a bind, then no PUBM binds are called at all for that string of text. In other words, you should trigger PUB binds first, if one matches, break out of the triggering loop (you can only cal...

No. Those messages are being presented from the eggdrop logging functions. See as the partyline is just a interactive log, provided you ahve the right console flags, you see each message saying there has been a change made via userfile sharing. Those messages are as such, incoming share messages, th...

This looks like detail from userfile sharing.

This means the person was added from another bot, not your own. You should see the logs from that bot instead.

BAH.

It have never been safe, nor unsafe.

To get the password in the first place, they must of hacked the information, upon which point your screwed regardless.

You should be more worried about general security and system security than the fact that hostmasks don't always match a single machine.

That has always been a security concern form day one.

The same can be said for any system that determines if a user is legitmate on more than just a username and password.

You are never going to get hardcore security out of a dynamic IP full stop.

RAW is the way to go, but be careful, you must force a return code to exit your proedure, or face missing text.

HMM - Can you please read the whole of a post, and not select the portions you wish to read.

Has the server got oidentd installed?

If not, re-read my post.

I would sugest contacting the tcllib team HERE rather than this forum.

oidentd is a admin installed rpogram and is nothing you can install. The only control you have is what is in the oidentd.conf file in your home dir. This isn't somthing that is [censored], it has existed longer than eggdrop has and is nothing eggdrop has any control over. Speak to your shell admins ...