egghelp.org community

[SaPrOuZy]

i asked this before and i got 2 different answers from whom i believe are 2 good scripters:

[demond]

• don't bind rejn, it's irrelevant to your protection script (as irrelevant as awyeah's answer); bind join only
  
• bind join is not triggered by rejoining from a split, unless wait-split (see eggdrop.conf) has expired
  
• DO NOT embed inline code as parameter to [bind], use proc name
  

_________________
connection, sharing, dcc problems? click <here>
before asking for scripting help, read <this>
use [code] tag when posting logs, code

[SaPrOuZy]

yea i guess that's the most logical thing
i have wait-split set to 7200 which should be enough for most splits (hopefully)
anyways i'll be testing it for the next couple of days and see how it goes.

thanks dude.

btw, how do you guys usually test your join flood scripts?

[demond]

by commanding a dronenet to mass-join

I personally don't have one, but I wrote a vhost cloner to emulate it
_________________
connection, sharing, dcc problems? click <here>
before asking for scripting help, read <this>
use [code] tag when posting logs, code

[Adrenalin]

It's a good idea to use

proc join {nick uhost hand chan} {
if {[info exists halt_protection($zchan)]} { return 0 }
}

proc splitjoin {nick uhost hand chan} {
..
set halt_protection($zchan) 1
utimer 5..set halt_protection($zchan) 0..
}

to check for netsplits..
On Undernet for example the rejoined user host from the net-split may differ from the initial net-split hosts, because of +x(user.undernet.org host instead of original, used to hide..) mode.
Example..
[19:59:25] * DYMA (~dyma@negariui.users.undernet.org) Quit (*.net *.split)
[20:07:10] * DYMA (~dyma@87.248.174.226) has joined #moldova

So if someone in the netsplit had same split-part host&split-rejoin host like this one:
[19:59:18] * D_I_M_C_A_17 (~dumy@216.99.16.117) Quit (*.net *.split)
[20:07:10] * D_I_M_C_A_17 (~dumy@216.99.16.117) has joined #moldova

You can save the situation with your sensible join flood protection script(like mine for example ;p)

[demond]

splits have exactly one thing to do with mass join flood protection, and that thing is wait-split - nothing more, nothing less; [bind rejn] which supposedly triggers your [splitjoin] proc is irrelevant

and changing unet host by issuing umode +x has hardly anything to do with mass join flood protection as well; it's neither automatic, nor done on rejoin
_________________
connection, sharing, dcc problems? click <here>
before asking for scripting help, read <this>
use [code] tag when posting logs, code

[SaPrOuZy]

[demond]

[Adrenalin]

The ideea is what in splits the masking host(+x) can be loosed,
instead of join user!ident@balblabla.user.undernet.org
join user!ident@real.ip
and instead of "bind rejn", "bind join" are triggered

And if between the splited users was someone with user!ident@real.ip.. We can prevent false flood protection alarm

[demond]

hmm I'm not too sure what you're trying to say, but I'd guess you mean there's a possibility that unet hostmasking will be gone if there's no uworld (or whatever their system-wide services are called) on the split - I'm not sure if that actually happens though

so how do you do that? I mean recognizing that scenario

post your script
_________________
connection, sharing, dcc problems? click <here>
before asking for scripting help, read <this>
use [code] tag when posting logs, code