| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tandilboy Voice
Joined: 01 Apr 2006 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 5:38 pm Post subject: Just 1 Eggdrop on Multiple networks!! |
|
|
| Itīs possible? help me! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deadite66 Halfop
Joined: 30 May 2005 Posts: 74 Location: Great Yarmouth, UK
|
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
energymech appears to be the way to go for multiserver _________________ <- tcl newb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
minted Halfop
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 64
|
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its not possible, no
the eggdrop developers say they wont make it possible either
shell admins wouldnt like it very much |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ladynikon Voice
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wow.. now i feel better. I been trying to get something like this working all day. I guess I will have to deal with this fact...
sadly I am the shell admin. So it kinda sucks that I can't have one bot on more than one network .  _________________ Have fun storming the castle! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
r0t3n Owner
Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 507 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, it is actually possible.
With enough tcl and irc protocal knowhow,
you could code a tcl script using sockets.
Either pure tcl or just an normal eggdrop tcl script.
You just need to know the USER, PRIVMSG, NOTICE irc protocals and/or raws. _________________ r0t3n @ #r0t3n @ Quakenet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sir_Fz Revered One

Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: Lebanon
|
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tosser^^ wrote: | Well, it is actually possible.
With enough tcl and irc protocal knowhow,
you could code a tcl script using sockets.
Either pure tcl or just an normal eggdrop tcl script.
You just need to know the USER, PRIVMSG, NOTICE irc protocals and/or raws. |
You would have to program an Eggdrop using Tcl for the socket bot to act as an Eggdrop, so that's a really bad idea  _________________ Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sKy Op

Joined: 14 Apr 2005 Posts: 194 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bad? Really? I don`t think so. Because of speed or what? To connect to a server and to do some things don`t need so much. It would just be a lot of coding work.
You can also use a trick way to write in C and look here. _________________ socketapi | Code less, create more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nml375 Revered One
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 Posts: 2857
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The point is, you're trying to tweak and patch eggdrop into being something it was not intended to be. Sure you could write a different, or even complementary, server module to permit additional server connections.
You would still have to go through each and every single sourcefile and make sure they can differentiate between the different server connections wherever neccesary.
You could also write some fancy tcl-package that handles a separate server connection. However, this would simply be an irc-client written in tcl, running in eggdrop's tcl environment. Integrating with eggdrop's native functions for userlist, channel maintenance (opping, kicking, etc) would be very messy...
In most cases, it's really easier to just start from scratch. This usually permits far better performance, as you can design the software to support multiple servers from scratch.
@sKy:
Wether writing it as an eggdrop module, or a tcl module really does'nt make much difference. You'd still have the daunting task of modifying vast parts of the source to properly handle multiple server connections. _________________ NML_375, idling at #eggdrop@IrcNET |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|