| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gto
Voice
Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 6
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:23 am Post subject: Silence instead of ignore |
 |
|
| I need a script to make the eggdrop to use /silence instead of ignore command |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alchera
Revered One
Joined: 11 Aug 2003
Posts: 3344
Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Silence?
_________________
Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gto
Voice
Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
/silence +zoo
Server side ignore for nickname zoo. Used on dalnet, undernet.
Is more effective than ignore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
metroid
Owner
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 771
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
silence only blocks PRIVMSG to the bot, not channelmessages.
ignore is therefor infact better, silence also resets when you disconnect and ignore does not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gto
Voice
Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| metroid wrote: | silence only blocks PRIVMSG to the bot, not channelmessages.
ignore is therefor infact better, silence also resets when you disconnect and ignore does not. |
When your bot msg-flooded by 100-150 floodbots ... there is no way to handle it without quits with msg "sendq exceeded" On the channel you simply place a +m or +l (to limit the mass join). I want to use it when my bots flooded by a specific number of floodbots. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
metroid
Owner
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 771
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AFAIK, silence is limited to 20 masks (atleast on quakenet).
And if you want a spambot protection, i would advice that you make something that checks the amount of messages recieved in the past <number> seconds, if it reaches a certain limit, set silence +*!*@*.
Automatic unsetting it after a few minutes or something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gto
Voice
Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| metroid wrote: | AFAIK, silence is limited to 20 masks (atleast on quakenet).
And if you want a spambot protection, i would advice that you make something that checks the amount of messages recieved in the past <number> seconds, if it reaches a certain limit, set silence +*!*@*.
Automatic unsetting it after a few minutes or something. |
How to do that ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alchera
Revered One
Joined: 11 Aug 2003
Posts: 3344
Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bahamut:
| Quote: | SILENCE [+|-<mask>]
Adds or deletes the specified nick!user@host mask to or from your silence list. Masks on the silence list will be unable to send you PRIVMSGs or NOTICEs. If no masks are specified, a list of masks currently in your silence list is returned. The list holds a maximum of 5 masks. |
_________________
Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
metroid
Owner
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 771
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually i was wrong, the limit is 15 on quakenet.
And i would suggest you check some other examples on this forum that have something to do with flood protection. I'm sure you can adapt one to do what you want. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alchera
Revered One
Joined: 11 Aug 2003
Posts: 3344
Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd seriously consider timed ignores. The use of silence would seem to be a bit limited.
_________________
Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gto
Voice
Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Alchera wrote: | | I'd seriously consider timed ignores. The use of silence would seem to be a bit limited. |
With ignores it is possible to exceed sendq .... so the disconnect it is matter of time.
We dont want our bots to got disconnected ....
A good idea is to change nick when flooded |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
krimson
Halfop
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 86
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| or you could combine the two ideeas and use timed silences. this would help in staying under the server's limit and won't exceed sendq |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Smurff
Voice
Joined: 09 Feb 2005
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| if you do silence + *!*@* it ignores everything for private messages ( private messages botnet flood). if there can be any such script which can perform Silence +|- thing for variable amount of time , it can solve the problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
