egghelp.org community

[samhain]

Hi I do not know why TCL coders haven't made a script yet which has the ability to punish an user through X, i mean on advertise/flood/spam/invite/badwords/badnick the bot bans through X and then removes it through X through a setting of a time in the TCL file.... it's a very nice idea to use undernet X because X bans can be maximum 300 and on undernet if the eggdrops bans manually then the banlist becomes full after 45 bans so please get me such kind of a script I really need it.

[Sir_Fz]

AllProtection4.6b7.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts

[samhain]

what's there is it the script I need I mean I have tried that TCL but it only works manually does it work through X?

[Sir_Fz]

Yes, version 4.6b7 supports banning through X when banlist is full.

[samhain]

sure I'm gonna try this, and where do I set the maximum number of bans in the eggdrop so that the number I set in the eggdrop is considered as the banlist full in the eggdrop.

[Alchera]

eggdrop.conf:

[silverboy]

[Zircon]

Hi all

The feature of banning through X on Undernet is completely functionnal, i confirm. By the way, in eggdrop.conf, i set max-bans to 0, so all the bans can be made through X even if the banlist isnt full.

Althougt banning through X is slower than before, coz AllProtection kick the offender first, and after send the ban command to X. Since banning through X makes the offender being kicked automatically by X, it may be better and faster to send only one command which is the ban, instead of kick + ban.

Example :

[19:08] <Zircon> ban Offender!*@* OUT 2400 499
[19:08] #culture: mode change '+b Offender!*@*' by X!cservice@undernet.org
[19:08] Offender kicked from #culture by X: (Zircon) OUT

Is it possible to change the behavior of the banning process when it s made through X, so only the ban command is used, insted of Kick then Ban ?

Thanks Sir_Fz for this Great Script

[iamdeath]

samhain either you use X or eggdrops bans they're the same because on Undernet channel banlist is max of 45 so it doesnt matter if X can hold 300 bans after 45 bans X wont be able to set a ban on the active bans it will only kick. Using X or eggdrop bans does'nt matter, what I will suggest is to use Eggdrops bans because it will be faster than sending request to X and then X proceeds.

Thanks
iamdeath
_________________
|AmDeAtH @ Undernet

Death is only the *Beginning*...

[Zircon]

Hello iamdeath

X isn't affected by the the limit of 45 bans, means that even if they are already 45 active bans, X can still add 300 others bans. So in total, u can put 345 bans, 300 through X, and 45 by regular users. The limit of 45 concern only bans not made through X.

[iamdeath]

I beg to refuse you on that sir, please check and then let me know. I am sure about my statement.

Thanks
_________________
|AmDeAtH @ Undernet

Death is only the *Beginning*...

[silverboy]

[iamdeath]

I do accept that X can hold 300 bans I am not refusing that, what I am saying is that when channels active banlist will reach 45 then X will not be able to ban the user because it will already exceed the number of allowed bans. So what happen will be, X will only kick it won't be able to place a ban it will only Kick. Yes, in X's database that ban will exsist but as soon as the channels banlist get lower than 45 then X will be able to set ban.

Read this:

Zagreb.HR.Eu.UnderNet.org u2.10.12.10 dioswkgx biklmnopstvrD bklov
WHOX WALLCHOPS WALLVOICES USERIP CPRIVMSG CNOTICE SILENCE=15 MODES=6 MAXCHANNELS=30 MAXBANS=45 NICKLEN=12 are supported by this server
MAXNICKLEN=15 TOPICLEN=160 AWAYLEN=160 KICKLEN=160 CHANNELLEN=200 MAXCHANNELLEN=200 CHANTYPES=#& PREFIX=(ov)@+ STATUSMSG=@+ CHANMODES=b,k,l,imnpstrDd CASEMAPPING=rfc1459 NETWORK=UnderNet are supported by this server

Thanks
iamdeath
_________________
|AmDeAtH @ Undernet

Death is only the *Beginning*...

[Zircon]

Hello iamdeath

I m positive about what i said, u can have up to 345 active bans at the same time, max of 45 bans done by users, plus max 300 bans done through X. X as a service, isnt limited by MAXBANS, which apply only to bans done bu regular OPs. I tested many times, and u can do the same. Right now i m having 50 active bans, 45 that i put myself, and 5 that i put through X.

[Alchera]

A simple solution is to contact an IRCOp/Administrator of the Network you both apparently share and settle this once and for all.

These forums deal specifically with eggdrop and Tcl not IRCD's and their "quirks".
_________________
Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM