| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dnevers Voice
Joined: 01 Sep 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:49 pm Post subject: stats.mod file version compatibility |
|
|
I'm in the middle of migrating a bot from a Windrop to an eggdrop, and while I'm at it I need to roll back the stats.mod from v1.4.0 to v1.3.3 to gain stability.
Any "gothca's" I should look out for? File versions compatible? Are there any issues carrying statsmod.dat over from a Win box to a linux machine? Thanks to anyone willing to share their experience and wisdom. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alchera Revered One

Joined: 11 Aug 2003 Posts: 3344 Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Basically the only difference between a Windrop and an eggdrop is that one runs on Windows. _________________ Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dnevers Voice
Joined: 01 Sep 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Alchera. I recognized that Windrops are actually eggdrops that operate in a Cygwin environment in Windows. I have a few of each and I'm making efforts to get them all on one platform. If I read you right, there should be no great concerns moving identically configured bots from one platform to another (ideally anyway).
My greater concern was the stats.mod compatibility from one version to another. I inherited the Windrop with the later version of the stats module and want to roll it back as I migrate it off of the Windows machine. My early tests on this are promising, but you never know. I was hoping the voice of experience would reassure me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alchera Revered One

Joined: 11 Aug 2003 Posts: 3344 Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
I do not use the stats module but I cannot see why the later version would be any problem with latest eggdrop. _________________ Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
De Kus Revered One

Joined: 15 Dec 2002 Posts: 1361 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am pretty sure I didnt have any problems, the module discarded the addional informations stored in the file afaik. In worest case you need to deleted them with some regular expression or similar. _________________ De Kus
StarZ|De_Kus, De_Kus or DeKus on IRC
Copyright © 2005-2009 by De Kus - published under The MIT License
Love hurts, love strengthens... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dnevers Voice
Joined: 01 Sep 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
After trying it on the live bot, I can say this much... It didn't like it! The first clue I had was some of the regulars werent being recognized by the stats module and being added like new users. Doing .smatch on a user gave some interesting results too - the host masks were out of sorts. If I tried to .smerge the newly added users it would sometimes add them back as a new user shortly after the merge. Worst yet was the overnight purgestats, it deleted over 1500 of the 2300 stats users in the userbase (and no, they werent otherwise ready to expire).
So, I'm back to trying to figure out a way to force compatibility. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|