| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ljesh
Voice
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 1
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 12:31 am Post subject: Eggdrop doesn't show up on IRC |
 |
|
Hello everyone.
I just installed Fedora Core 6 and eggdrop (latest version).
I tryed to start it with ./eggdrop -m eggdrop.conf but although the process stays active and it says the eggdrop has started, he doesn't show up on IRC.
I killed that process and tryed again, but this time the same command only -n added in the end. I can see the things getting activated, I can see the eggdrop connectin... and I check on IRC, he is there. EVERYTIME I start it with -n option, he shows up on IRC. Without it never shows up.
What is the cause of my problem and how can I fix it please?
Thanks in advance for your kind help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DragnLord
Owner
Joined: 24 Jan 2004
Posts: 711
Location: C'ville, Virginia, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
You should have a logfile set for the bot in the conf file
| Code: | | logfile mcoxsb * "logs/eggdrop.log" |
Hopefully this will give you some useful information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
StarteR2
Voice
Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is actually is a serious problem that I have too and I do have a log file and it says:
Writting Userfile
Writting Channel File
and than when i kill it it add something with TERMSIGNAL.
as ljesh already says in -n it shows up. There is a solution with the -n option you can run it with -n in background but its a very crappy solution. This is how i do it
| Code: | | ./eggdrop -n YTTRIUM.conf 2>&1 & |
Now. i found another solution
RPM:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/ppc/eggdrop-1.6.18-4.el5.ppc.rpm
Problem with it is:
| Code: | 1.
*** glibc detected *** ./eggdrop: free(): invalid pointer: 0x089e1060 ***
2.
======= Backtrace: =========
3.
/lib/libc.so.6[0x9ab09d]
4.
/lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x90)[0x9ae6f0]
5.
./eggdrop[0x8066c42]
6.
./eggdrop[0x807069a]
7.
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc)[0x95af2c]
8.
./eggdrop[0x804a3e1]
9.
======= Memory map: ========
10.
*** glibc detected *** ./eggdrop: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x088704e8 ***
11.
======= Backtrace: =========
12.
/lib/libc.so.6[0x54a09d]
13.
/lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x90)[0x54d6f0]
14.
./eggdrop[0x8065844]
15.
/eggdrop.old/modules/share.so[0x18941a]
16.
./eggdrop[0x80687f9]
17.
./eggdrop[0x8065566]
18.
./eggdrop[0x80707df]
19.
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc)[0x4f9f2c]
20.
./eggdrop[0x804a3e1]
21.
======= Memory map: ========
22.
*** glibc detected *** ./eggdrop: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x09669400 ***
23.
======= Backtrace: =========
24.
/lib/libc.so.6[0x9ab09d]
25.
/lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x90)[0x9ae6f0]
26.
./eggdrop[0x8065844]
27.
/eggdrop.old/modules/share.so[0xdbf41a]
28.
./eggdrop[0x80687f9]
29.
./eggdrop[0x8065566]
30.
./eggdrop[0x80707df]
31.
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc)[0x95af2c]
32.
./eggdrop[0x804a3e1]
33.
======= Memory map: ======== |
I will try the RPM for 1.6.17 now.
What I have realised is that nothing blocks the eggdrop. It just wont open a proper port. You CANT even TELNET to it.[/code]
Last edited by StarteR2 on Sun Apr 22, 2007 1:20 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
StarteR2
Voice
Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Follow up.
Same problem with 1.6.16
| Code: | ======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/libc.so.6[0x9ab09d]
/lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x90)[0x9ae6f0]
./eggdrop[0x8079d8e]
/usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so(TclEvalObjvInternal+0x2fb)[0x255f3b]
/usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so(Tcl_EvalEx+0x40f)[0x2564cf]
/usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so(Tcl_Eval+0x3c)[0x2567dc]
/usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so(Tcl_VarEvalVA+0x7c)[0x25690c]
/usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so(Tcl_VarEval+0x27)[0x256967]
./eggdrop[0x807e714]
./eggdrop[0x807e9a0]
/eggdrop.old/modules/server.so[0xcce47c]
./eggdrop[0x807040e]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc)[0x95af2c]
./eggdrop[0x804a371]
======= Memory map: ========
*** glibc detected *** ./eggdrop: free(): invalid pointer: 0x09a53cf8 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/libc.so.6[0x9ab09d]
/lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x90)[0x9ae6f0]
./eggdrop[0x8054cc2]
./eggdrop[0x80656d8]
/eggdrop.old/modules/share.so[0x40641a]
./eggdrop[0x80685a9]
./eggdrop[0x80653c6]
./eggdrop[0x807052b]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc)[0x95af2c]
./eggdrop[0x804a371]
======= Memory map: ========
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
StarteR2
Voice
Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 4
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alchera
Revered One
Joined: 11 Aug 2003
Posts: 3344
Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | | wget ftp://ftp.eggheads.org/pub/eggdrop/source/1.6/eggdrop1.6.18.tar.gz |
_________________
Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
StarteR2
Voice
Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
did you not read what i said? source doesnt work. Anyways i already figuered out the problem.
TCL needs to be compiled/recompiled from source with disabled threads and then eggdrop must be recompilled. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DragnLord
Owner
Joined: 24 Jan 2004
Posts: 711
Location: C'ville, Virginia, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
It seems like these problems are happening on Fedora, so far only Fedora has been mentioned as the operating system.
If so, you may want to look at using a different operating system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nml375
Revered One
Joined: 04 Aug 2006
Posts: 2857
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm running 1.6.18 without any issues under FC4 (Stentz) using tcl8.4.9-3.
This version (of tcl), however, is not threaded or linked against libpthread.
| Code: | $ ldd -v /usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so
linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00457000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x005bc000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00594000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00475000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00458000)
Version information:
/usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so:
libdl.so.2 (GLIBC_2.1) => /lib/libdl.so.2
libdl.so.2 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib/libdl.so.2
libm.so.6 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib/libm.so.6
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.1.3) => /lib/libc.so.6
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.2) => /lib/libc.so.6
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.3.4) => /lib/libc.so.6
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.3) => /lib/libc.so.6
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.1) => /lib/libc.so.6
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib/libc.so.6
/lib/libdl.so.2:
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.1.3) => /lib/libc.so.6
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.1) => /lib/libc.so.6
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib/libc.so.6
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib/libc.so.6
ld-linux.so.2 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
/lib/libm.so.6:
ld-linux.so.2 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.1.3) => /lib/libc.so.6
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib/libc.so.6
/lib/libc.so.6:
ld-linux.so.2 (GLIBC_2.1) => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
ld-linux.so.2 (GLIBC_2.3) => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
ld-linux.so.2 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 |
Also, downloaded the .srpm's for FC5 and FC6, and it would seem from the changelog that threads was enabled as of 8.4.12-4.
One option on these systems would be to download the source-rpm, modify the .spec-file (look for a line containing --enable-threads), and rebuild the rpm-package.
_________________
NML_375, idling at #eggdrop@IrcNET |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DragnLord
Owner
Joined: 24 Jan 2004
Posts: 711
Location: C'ville, Virginia, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Threaded TCL works fine on all my FreeBSD machines, so this problem with threaded TCL may just be with Fedora (and derivatives)?
Or is this a problem with most GNU systems? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nml375
Revered One
Joined: 04 Aug 2006
Posts: 2857
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
After digging through the source abit, it would seem it might be an issue where the configure-scripts fail to properly detect that the tcl-libraries are thread-enabled on these platforms.
_________________
NML_375, idling at #eggdrop@IrcNET |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DragnLord
Owner
Joined: 24 Jan 2004
Posts: 711
Location: C'ville, Virginia, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If TCL is built from source, instead of RPM, would it install correctly? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nml375
Revered One
Joined: 04 Aug 2006
Posts: 2857
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Downloading the source and compiling manually would work just fine, with the only exception/issue that rpm might have some issues solving dependancies (which can be overridden).
There is still the option of building your own rpm's using a custom .spec-file, which allows you to compile it to your likes while preserving rpm-dependancies.
_________________
NML_375, idling at #eggdrop@IrcNET |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DragnLord
Owner
Joined: 24 Jan 2004
Posts: 711
Location: C'ville, Virginia, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And this makes a great example of why I love FreeBSD's ports.
"To each their own." as the saying goes. Hopefully the RPM makers will fix it for the GNU communities that use them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
