| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hankey
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 7:33 pm Post subject: +S mode on linknet |
 |
|
hi,
i tried search but i couldnt find anything releated. linknet uses "/mode #chan +S" to secure a channel. that prevents users with an unencrypted connection to join in. when i define my chanmodes with ".chanset #chan chanmode +S" the eggdrop will ignore the uppercase S or convert it to lowercase, dunno exactly, since i always set the lowercase +s (for secret), too.
is there any possibilty to get the bot to set the +S ?
or will a future version of eggdrop support this mode ?
hankey |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kain
Halfop
Joined: 15 Mar 2002
Posts: 91
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you could use:
.dump mode #chan +S
or script it |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ppslim
Revered One
Joined: 23 Sep 2001
Posts: 3914
Location: Liverpool, England
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hankey
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
thx, i already was afraid of that this is the reason.
well then i gotta go and learn scripting a bit  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mcdarby
Halfop
Joined: 16 Jul 2002
Posts: 69
Location: Bangor, Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2002 1:27 am Post subject: Re: +S mode on linknet |
|
|
| hankey wrote: | hi,
i tried search but i couldnt find anything releated. linknet uses "/mode #chan +S" to secure a channel. that prevents users with an unencrypted connection to join in. when i define my chanmodes with ".chanset #chan chanmode +S" the eggdrop will ignore the uppercase S or convert it to lowercase, dunno exactly, since i always set the lowercase +s (for secret), too.
is there any possibilty to get the bot to set the +S ?
or will a future version of eggdrop support this mode ?
hankey |
If this bot is on a network that has services and your channel already has +r, you can do a "/ChanServ HELP" to learn how to have ChanServ set and keep the +S instead of the bot.
--
Erik McDarby |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ppslim
Revered One
Joined: 23 Sep 2001
Posts: 3914
Location: Liverpool, England
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2002 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just checking, you are using 1.6.12 with the SSL patch?
You aere connected using ssl?
It's a bit pointless, when a OP sets +S, when that means he can't join in himself. It may be the network that is removing it.
_________________
PlusNet Supported Customer - Low cost UK ISP services |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SmokeyOne
Halfop
Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Posts: 69
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2003 6:19 am Post subject: LinkNet's +S command |
|
|
| ppslim wrote: | Just checking, you are using 1.6.12 with the SSL patch?
You aere connected using ssl?
It's a bit pointless, when a OP sets +S, when that means he can't join in himself. It may be the network that is removing it. |
LinkNet doesn't use services, its a normal channel command, which has to be set by the user or in this case a bot. I would just be better to script the channel command, and might as well include some other SSL stuff in it.
the +S command is just a flag that denies none SSL clients to join a channel that's +Sed.
Also, the network wouldn't remove this flag unless it was changed after a split, which isn't something that is common on LinkNet |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ppslim
Revered One
Joined: 23 Sep 2001
Posts: 3914
Location: Liverpool, England
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2003 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
In a real life example.
User connects to a server.
He decides to set himself +i for invisable. On top, he decides to set himself +o (IE, and IRCOPER).
The server would simply drop the +o, as he isn't authorised.
In the real world, once some1 has sent and euthorised an /oper command, he/she can set +o or -o on there usermode (not channel user or channel mode) as they wish.
My point is, is it the same for the +S flag. Will the IRC server allow a NON SSL connected client/bot to set this mode?
_________________
PlusNet Supported Customer - Low cost UK ISP services |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SmokeyOne
Halfop
Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Posts: 69
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2003 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ppslim wrote: | In a real life example.
User connects to a server.
He decides to set himself +i for invisable. On top, he decides to set himself +o (IE, and IRCOPER).
The server would simply drop the +o, as he isn't authorised.
In the real world, once some1 has sent and euthorised an /oper command, he/she can set +o or -o on there usermode (not channel user or channel mode) as they wish.
My point is, is it the same for the +S flag. Will the IRC server allow a NON SSL connected client/bot to set this mode? |
Knowing that this is a user/channel flag. as a user if your not connect under SSL, no you can not set this flag, but if your a normal user and do /mode #blah +S you will set the channel +S. If you leave the channel and someone is in there, you won't be able to join the channel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nitro_007
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2003 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
hi im having the same problem and have started writing a tcl to enforce new channel modes ie linknets +S
and yes my bot has been patched and is connecting thru SSl server
the problem im having is the eggdrop command getchanmode = get chanmodes from its own enforce data not the real existing channel modes
how can i query the true channel modes in tcl rather than eggdrop settings
also if anyones interested heres my thread on the subbject
http://forum.egghelp.org/viewtopic.php?p=22738#22738
which contains the basis of my 1st ever tcl script but due to the above problem it remains unfinnished
currently im in the position of pushmode #chan +S 1c an hour reguardless of if its allready set or not
id rather it checked 1c per minute and if set do nothing, if not set invoke
unless my approach to the problem is wrong and
itheres a better way to do this etc then please advise me on how it should be approached |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MtM
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| how did you guys get your eggdrop+SSL patch to connect to a SSL server? Is there any special setting? Or just tell your eggy to connect to the SSL port on the ircd? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
YooHoo
Owner
Joined: 13 Feb 2003
Posts: 939
Location: Redwood Coast
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MtM wrote: | | how did you guys get your eggdrop+SSL patch to connect to a SSL server? Is there any special setting? Or just tell your eggy to connect to the SSL port on the ircd? |
could be that you were asleep, Rumplestilskin, but there is a new service called goooooooooooooooooogle, you should check it out someday, then you could be cool like me and spit out links to LinkNet's SSL page. I gave this document a cursory glance only, and figured most people who are having trouble connecting with eggdrop to ssl-encrypted servers on linknet have not read this, so they wouldn't know to use port 7000  are you one o' them people?
_________________
Johoho's TCL for beginners
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MtM
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| heh, well... I DO connect to port 7000! And it still won't connect. (Linknet) Is there anything else you know of that will stop me from connecting? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dollar
Op
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 178
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Try this patch hankey, should work (this only adds the mode S to eggdrop, nothing else):
http://nullrouted.biz/linknet+S.diff
For information on how to apply this patch to your bot read this.
_________________
dollar (or something similar) at:
#eggdrop / #tcl - undernet
#egghelp / #tcl / #eggtcl - efnet
#eggdrop.support / #tcl - quakenet
#eggdrop - ircnet |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
soraver
Voice
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Posts: 5
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
so, where can i find this linknet+s.diff?
there's a 404 there, and eggdrop still doesnt support the +S mode :S |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
