| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
slennox
Owner
Joined: 22 Sep 2001
Posts: 593
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 5:44 pm Post subject: Test version of sentinel.tcl v4.09.1 |
 |
|
I've finally made some time to work on sentinel.tcl and prepare an updated version. While preparing it, I had a look at the overhauled version that I'd been working on a few years ago, and although it appears mostly complete, I concluded that it would take too much time to sufficiently refamiliarise myself with it and retest everything. So good old v4.09 with an oft-requested feature or two added will have to do.
v4.09.1-test1 for netbots.tcl users (I don't know yet whether I'll be releasing a standalone version) fixes a small bug in the nick flood detection and adds that most requested feature: custom lock modes. There is one caveat: the +i and +m modes remain. This was to reduce the complexity of the modifications and prevent an end-run attack on weaker modes.
You can download test1 here. To install it, just overwrite the existing sentinel.tcl and .rehash. You'll find the new sl_locktimes setting at the top of the script, including a description of it. I wouldn't bother moving this setting to netset.tcl for now; just adjust it in place. Note that the sl_ilocktime and sl_mlocktime settings in your netset.tcl are no longer used and will be ignored. After loading the new version, type .sentinel to check that your lock modes/times are set as expected.
Problems should be reported in this thread. Logfiles demonstrating problems can be e-mailed to me directly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slennox
Owner
Joined: 22 Sep 2001
Posts: 593
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2005 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Test2 is now available. This adds some text and notice flood detection in a way that was relatively simple to implement--as part of an amalgamated text/notice/tsunami/avalanche mechanism. Please refer to the section at the top of the test script for more information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
awyeah
Revered One
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1580
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh a new final version of sentinel is finally out! after waiting a long interval of 3 years 
_________________
·awyeah·
==================================
Facebook: jawad@idsia.ch (Jay Dee)
PS: Guys, I don't accept script helps or requests personally anymore.
================================== |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alchera
Revered One
Joined: 11 Aug 2003
Posts: 3344
Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've been using Test2 version of sentinel and am pleased with its' performance. So far, with a number of attempts to text flood a number of channels I have bots in, it's performed as expected. In one channel (which I am actually sitting in to watch) last night 6 flood bots entered and only managed to get a total of 12 lines in before the channel locking kicked in; bearing in mind that I have yet to still "play" with the sl_txlength setting. 
_________________
Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vixs
Voice
Joined: 15 May 2004
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am running eggdrop v1.6.18+morecopyrights and have loaded the test2 file and this is wat the error it shows
| Code: | <RockBabe> [16:38] can't read "sl_bxsimul": no such variable
<RockBabe> while executing
<RockBabe> "if {$sl_bxsimul} {
<RockBabe> bind raw - 001 sl_bxserverjoin
<RockBabe> if {![info exists sl_bxonestack]} {
<RockBabe> set sl_bxonestack 0
<RockBabe> }
<RockBabe> if { , Does this require netbots to work? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alchera
Revered One
Joined: 11 Aug 2003
Posts: 3344
Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Vixs wrote: | | Edit: I realised , Does this require netbots to work? |
Oh, very much so.
_________________
Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mm
Halfop
Joined: 01 Jul 2004
Posts: 78
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, how the setting will work for undernet, since undernet has mode +r and may be doesn't need +i
so should i set
set sl_locktimes {r:120 m:60}?
thanks
_________________
MM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alchera
Revered One
Joined: 11 Aug 2003
Posts: 3344
Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, that should work fine.
_________________
Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sir_Fz
Revered One
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 3793
Location: Lebanon
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | There are two rules. First, the minimum locktime for any mode is 30 seconds. Second, modes +i and +m must be included. |
I guess you can't remove +i and +m.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mm
Halfop
Joined: 01 Jul 2004
Posts: 78
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, well i've upload the test2 with the following setting
| Quote: | set sl_locktimes {i:30 m:60 r:60}
set sl_txflood 6:15
set sl_txlength 180
set sl_nclength 1
set sl_linecap 50:15 |
then i have used few clone ip's to test this using control char, bold etc, but it didn't trigger at all..
when i do .sentinel i can see the setting is there
_________________
MM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
De Kus
Revered One
Joined: 15 Dec 2002
Posts: 1361
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
with a bit teaking I got this test version running as standalone. you just need the settings from netset.tcl and the procs nb_sendcmd and nb_killutimer (i have bitchx simul disabled  ) from netbot.tcl.
PS: beat me, if I missed any change I made .
PPS: I changed the locktime setting to this
| Code: | if { $network == "QuakeNet" } {
set sl_locktimes {i:30 m:30 r:300}
} elseif { $network == "euIRCnet" } {
set sl_locktimes {i:30 m:30 R:300}
} else {
set sl_locktimes {i:120 m:30}
} |
probably only intresting when 2 bots running on diffrent networks are running on same directory. But maybe you consider using the "only regististred" Mode in flood cases, this mode will block most multi-host spamer and leave the channel free for kind registred chatters .
_________________
De Kus
StarZ|De_Kus, De_Kus or DeKus on IRC
Copyright © 2005-2009 by De Kus - published under The MIT License
Love hurts, love strengthens... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mm
Halfop
Joined: 01 Jul 2004
Posts: 78
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry test2 version is working great. thank you to slennox
_________________
MM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arvent
Voice
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 4
Location: Bulgaria
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:14 pm Post subject: ban mask |
|
|
Hii. I use netbots.tcl v4.10. When sentinel get someone banned it get double * in front of the inent.
I have set it with set sl_masktype 2 in order to get this ban mask: *!*ident@*.domain.com, but instead get the: *!**ident@*.domain.com.
Am I doing something wrong and the most important what can I do to fix it?
Thanks in advance.
P.S.
Great work with the scripts. Brings much joy and safety.
Chears.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
slennox
Owner
Joined: 22 Sep 2001
Posts: 593
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:38 pm Post subject: Re: ban mask |
|
|
| arvent wrote: | I have set it with set sl_masktype 2 in order to get this ban mask: *!*ident@*.domain.com, but instead get the: *!**ident@*.domain.com.
Am I doing something wrong and the most important what can I do to fix it? |
Looks as though an argument was added to the masktype command in eggdrop 1.6.20 allowing selection of a hostmask type, but the new default type is different from what the command would've returned prior to 1.6.20, which can break compatibility with scripts that expect it to behave as documented in 1.6.19 and earlier.
A small change to line 1155 (for the sentinel.tcl included with netbots.tcl v4.10) will probably fix it:
Replace:
| Code: | | 2 {return *!*[lindex [split [maskhost $uhost] "!"] 1]} |
With:
| Code: | | 2 {return *!*[lindex [split [maskhost $uhost 0] "!"] 1]} |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arvent
Voice
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 4
Location: Bulgaria
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:34 am Post subject: Re: ban mask |
|
|
You are correct about the eggdrop version. I am using 1.6.21.
The ban mask change with the new line to: *!*ident@machine.domain.com as it is in sl_masktype 1.
Thanks for your replay and efforts.
Best |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
