| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Hal
Voice
Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 1
|
 Posted: Fri May 06, 2005 10:21 am Post subject: new reop channel flag (+R) on IRCnet network |
 |
|
hello,
is it possible to make a egg support for such flag?
flag is added to channel with hostmask of people allowed to recived op from server in case of chan bacome opless.
example:
14:41:05 -!- mode/#testchan [+R *!test@somwhere.at.net] by nikt
in i use bind mode it shows me everithing but victim is empty for this mode.
im begginer in tcl 4 eggdrop, so hope i didnt missed anything
regards
Hal |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KrzychuG
Master
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Posts: 306
Location: Torun, Poland
|
| Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's because Eggdrop already support R mode but it works as +m, +n etc. To use it properly in Tcl you have to bind it on RAW. Here you can find some explanation (in polish) how to make such procedure(s) and use it in Eggdrop or bots based on Eggdrop. Currently only 'psotnic' support +R mode fully, 'Evangeline' at about 80%.
_________________
Que? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
YooHoo
Owner
Joined: 13 Feb 2003
Posts: 939
Location: Redwood Coast
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:55 am Post subject: Re: new reop channel flag (+R) on IRCnet network |
|
|
| Hal wrote: | is it possible to make a egg support for such flag?
flag is added to channel with hostmask of people allowed to recived op from server in case of chan bacome opless.
example:
14:41:05 -!- mode/#testchan [+R *!test@somwhere.at.net] by nikt
in i use bind mode it shows me everithing but victim is empty for this mode. |
Eggdrop lets you add as many new flags as there aren't used.
Set newflag[num] z
where [num] is a number that doesn't exists...
Johoho's Guide to tcl touches on this subject in 'easy to understand' layman's terms.
_________________
Johoho's TCL for beginners
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
demond
Revered One
Joined: 12 Jun 2004
Posts: 3073
Location: San Francisco, CA
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 7:16 pm Post subject: Re: new reop channel flag (+R) on IRCnet network |
|
|
| YooHoo wrote: | | Hal wrote: | is it possible to make a egg support for such flag?
flag is added to channel with hostmask of people allowed to recived op from server in case of chan bacome opless.
example:
14:41:05 -!- mode/#testchan [+R *!test@somwhere.at.net] by nikt
in i use bind mode it shows me everithing but victim is empty for this mode. |
Eggdrop lets you add as many new flags as there aren't used.
Set newflag[num] z
where [num] is a number that doesn't exists...
Johoho's Guide to tcl touches on this subject in 'easy to understand' layman's terms.
|
while your remark is valid, I think that guy had another thing in mind... he actually talked about a channel mode, somewhat confusingly calling it "channel flag"
introducing new chanmodes in eggdrop is hard
I mean, all chanmode processing is hardcoded (src/mod/irc.mod/mode.c, gotmode() function), so introducing IRCnet's +R would have to substitute the already existent +R handler - for eggdrop, +R means a channel that is accessible to registered nicks only (DALnet and the like) - that's why on triggering bind mode for +R your victim parameter is empty - because DALnet's +R doesn't include a parameter
so, to make your eggdrop IRCnet+R-aware, you have to patch it accordingly, sacrificing its DALnet compatibility (that means you can't run the same handling +R binary on DALnet and IRCnet)
needless to say, that's not flexible at all - I mean eggdrop's chanmode handling design - and in that regard, much can be learned and borrowed from modern ircd's, which allow for easy definition and implementing handlers for new chanmodes |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
De Kus
Revered One
Joined: 15 Dec 2002
Posts: 1361
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it isnt that hard, if someone bothers to make a patch file for it, you could dynmatically load with a ./configure argument or something like that.
PS: looked at the channel_modes.c, looks to me neither better neither worse than eggdrops code, maybe except, in eggdrop its split into more files  .
_________________
De Kus
StarZ|De_Kus, De_Kus or DeKus on IRC
Copyright © 2005-2009 by De Kus - published under The MIT License
Love hurts, love strengthens...
Last edited by De Kus on Mon Jun 20, 2005 7:50 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
demond
Revered One
Joined: 12 Jun 2004
Posts: 3073
Location: San Francisco, CA
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| De Kus wrote: | | it isnt that hard, if someone bothers to make a patch file for it, you could dynmatically load with a ./configure argument or something like that. |
something like what? 
you mean specifying whether IRCnet's +R handler ot DALnet's +R handler gets compiled? what about network X where they have their own +R? you make a new patch every time a new mode has to be supported? and you call that easy?
if you know C, download ircd-hybrid sources and see what I'm talking about |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
