| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sir_Fz Revered One

Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: Lebanon
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hehe thanks mate. I wouldn't replace sentinel, you can still use its private protection  _________________ Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnnys Voice
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sir_fz how can i disable the "join flood protection"? after a netsplit when the guys join again - your script bans a lot of the joiners..botnet protection is disabled!!
(08:09:56) AK sets mode 2(+b *!*@kgb.de)
(08:09:57) AK sets mode 2(+mr)
(08:09:57) AK has kicked kgb`off-puschi (Possible Flood-Bot)
(08:09:57) AK has kicked kgb`off-dg (Possible Flood-Bot)
(08:09:5 AK has kicked kgb`off-aLi (Possible Flood-Bot)
(08:10:02) AK has kicked kbg-Rox (Possible Flood-Bot)
(08:10:04) AK has kicked kgb`SToFF (Possible Flood-Bot)
(08:10:0 AK has kicked kgb`john (Possible Flood-Bot |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sir_Fz Revered One

Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: Lebanon
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Join flood protection depends on the eggdrop's built-in flood-join, I think if you increase the wait-split in your .conf file then these joins will not be considered as joins but as returns (in the wait-split period), not sure though. _________________ Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnnys Voice
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| drone nicks works really bad in 4.1 - 4.0 was much better.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sir_Fz Revered One

Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: Lebanon
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| johnnys wrote: | | drone nicks works really bad in 4.1 - 4.0 was much better.. |
I expected such a comment I'll change it back in the next version along with some other new features. _________________ Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sir_Fz Revered One

Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: Lebanon
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, I've submitted version 4.2 to the tcl archive so it should be there by tomorrow but it's already on my site to be downloaded. This version has private flood protections as well, and I added the ability to relay to the channel when warning a nick (configurable) + returned the old drone:kick proc. _________________ Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnnys Voice
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
n1 n1 n1 do you need a bnc? but only for quakenet or a steam account? your script is really n1, but i got no money to pay you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sir_Fz Revered One

Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: Lebanon
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's fair enough that you like it but keep your offer available who knows I might need it some time  _________________ Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thunderdome Op

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 187
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| what about akick remover option? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sir_Fz Revered One

Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: Lebanon
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thunderdome wrote: | | what about akick remover option? |
And what's that? _________________ Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thunderdome Op

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 187
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
IF someone akicks the bot, the bot will remove the akick!
I think this is important, since without this all protections are really useless against someone with enough level to akick...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sir_Fz Revered One

Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: Lebanon
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
What kind of servers would allow an akicked user to be able to remove his own akick. _________________ Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thunderdome Op

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 187
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ptnet for example! A person can get akick always...and can only remove it if it has enough level. since my bot has it, I think this owuld be a good implement. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
^DooM^ Owner

Joined: 26 Aug 2003 Posts: 772 Location: IronForge
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What Exactly IS an akick though? Is it where someone can kick from outside a channel or is it like a ban, what? I personally have never heard of this feature. _________________ The lifecycle of a noob is complex. Fledgling noobs gestate inside biometric pods. Once a budding noob has matured thru gestation they climb out of their pod, sit down at a PC, ask a bunch of questions that are clearly in the FAQ, The Noob is born |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thunderdome Op

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 187
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you do /chanserv akick add nick for example.
And nick is automatically kicked out of the channel... only one with enough level can unackick him... or himself, if he has the the level to do it.
It's not ban, it's really an automatic kick.
If this is placed on a bot, no chance!
There I ask for the akick remover.
/chanserv akick del (botnick)
greetz |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|