| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sir_Fz
Revered One
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 3793
Location: Lebanon
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:21 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Make sure the password is correct (and without <>). Also, you can try something like
_________________
Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
willyw
Revered One
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 1175
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sir_Fz wrote: | | willyw wrote: | Excellent!
Which settings, and I will copy them here.
See.... I thought I had them all set off. ....I must be missing something.
Thanks |
Everything under
| Code: | ###########################
# PRIVATE PROTECTIONS #
########################### |
is related to private floods. |
That's what I thought... and I thought I had them all off, like this:
| Code: |
###########################
# PRIVATE PROTECTIONS #
###########################
# Set here if you want the bot to set a restriction mode on itself when flooded.
# example: +R is used on DALnet so only registered users can send to the bot.
# set this to "" if you don't wish to change your bot's modes during a flood.
# NOTE: Maximum 1 mode, less or more means it's disabled.
###set apfp(rmode) R
set apfp(rmode) ""
# Set here the time you want to keep the restriction mode in seconds.
###set apfp(rtime) 30
set apfp(rtime) 5
# How many seconds do you want to stop answering data from server?
##set apfp(itime) 45
set apfp(itime) 5
#
## 1 ## Private text floods.
#
# Private text (lines) flood <lines>:<seconds>. (0:0 to disable)
###set ptextl(punish) 12:6
set ptextl(punish) 0:0
# Private text (chars) flood <chars>:<seconds>. (0:0 to disable)
###set ptextc(punish) 750:6
set ptextc(punish) 0:0
#
## 2 ## Private notice floods.
#
###set pnotil(punish) 6:3
set pnotil(punish) 0:0
###set pnotic(punish) 600:4
set pnotic(punish) 0:0
#
## 3 ## Private CTCP/CTCR flood.
#
###set pctcpf(punish) 4:20
set pctcpf(punish) 0:0
# Configurations end here. #
|
Yet it was still doing it.
What do you think?
Thanks
also, from previous post:
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
Just make sure you set a password to that user.
|
What is the significance of setting a pw?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sir_Fz
Revered One
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 3793
Location: Lebanon
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Make sure you .rehashed after changing these settings (since they're not dynamic).
About the password advice, just an extra security measure to prevent accessing the partyline (although afaik it's not possible to access the partyline without a password).
_________________
Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
willyw
Revered One
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 1175
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sir_Fz wrote: | Make sure you .rehashed after changing these settings (since they're not dynamic).
|
Bot has been restarted and rehashed plenty of times, since these changes were made... that's why I was surprised to see it do what I reported.
What do you make of it?
| Quote: |
About the password advice, just an extra security measure to prevent accessing the partyline (although afaik it's not possible to access the partyline without a password). |
Ok. Didn't know if there might be something new to me there.
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sir_Fz
Revered One
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 3793
Location: Lebanon
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| willyw wrote: | | Sir_Fz wrote: | Make sure you .rehashed after changing these settings (since they're not dynamic).
|
Bot has been restarted and rehashed plenty of times, since these changes were made... that's why I was surprised to see it do what I reported.
What do you make of it? |
I checked the code, I'm pretty sure that when the settings are set to 0:0 the script definitely won't react to private floods. Did this happen again after the restart?
_________________
Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
willyw
Revered One
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 1175
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sir_Fz wrote: | | willyw wrote: | | Sir_Fz wrote: | Make sure you .rehashed after changing these settings (since they're not dynamic).
|
Bot has been restarted and rehashed plenty of times, since these changes were made... that's why I was surprised to see it do what I reported.
What do you make of it? |
I checked the code, I'm pretty sure that when the settings are set to 0:0 the script definitely won't react to private floods. Did this happen again after the restart? |
??
Yes |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sir_Fz
Revered One
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 3793
Location: Lebanon
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Would you mind pasting the content of procedure [pnotc]?
_________________
Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jade
Voice
Joined: 28 Oct 2009
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sir_Fiz
Thanks alot finally the i can identify to my antispam bot nick  . This time it worked, i appreciate your quick response over this.
Regards
Jade |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
willyw
Revered One
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 1175
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sir_Fz wrote: | | Would you mind pasting the content of procedure [pnotc]? |
Sure thing.
| Code: |
proc pnotc {nick uhost hand arg dest} {
variable pnotil; variable pnotic
foreach {pntll pntls} [split $pnotil(punish) :] {break}
foreach {pntcl pntcs} [split $pnotic(punish) :] {break}
if {[isbotnick [lindex [split $dest @] 0]] && ![matchattr $hand fmo]} {
if {($pntll > 0 && [follow $pntls pnotl $pntll] != -1) || ($pntcl > 0 && [follow $pntcs pnotc $pntcl [string length $arg]] != -1)} {
privl NOTICE
}
}
}
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sir_Fz
Revered One
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 3793
Location: Lebanon
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well there you have it, based on the logic in this procedure it's impossible for the script to trigger protection against private notices if the settings are set to 0:0. If you still wish to debug this, you can try '.tcl array names ::AllProtection::following' when the protection is triggered and paste the output here.
Edit: Fixed mistake [array names] instead of [array list]
_________________
Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts
Last edited by Sir_Fz on Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
willyw
Revered One
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 1175
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sir_Fz wrote: | | Well there you have it, based on the logic in this procedure it's impossible for the script to trigger protection against private notices if the settings are set to 0:0. If you still wish to debug this, you can try '.tcl array list ::AllProtection::following' when the protection is triggered and paste the output here. |
[17:24] AP: Private botnet flood detected. Temporarly stopped answering recieved data.
<mynick> .tcl array list ::AllProtection::following
<botnick> Tcl error: bad option "list": must be anymore, donesearch, exists, get, names, nextelement, set, size, startsearch, statistics, or unset |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sir_Fz
Revered One
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 3793
Location: Lebanon
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My bad, I meant [array names] and not [array list].
_________________
Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
willyw
Revered One
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 1175
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sir_Fz wrote: | | My bad, I meant [array names] and not [array list]. |
np...
| Code: |
[19:41] AP: Private botnet flood detected. Temporarly stopped answering recieved data.
<mynick> .tcl array names ::AllProtection::following
<botnick> Tcl: pnotc rpt:6a6373a1a0cc54e39ec1868b58dd23c1 rpt:0b116253df5ad80969c09c62d9cf9d84
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sir_Fz
Revered One
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 3793
Location: Lebanon
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
willyw, I just tested it on my eggdrop using AllProtection4.6b9 and definitely when pnotil(punish) is set to 0:0 (or any other private flood setting for that matter), the script won't react on any private notice. However, in v4.6b8 that's not the case. Make sure you're using the latest version, that's all I can suggest since I made sure it's working correctly.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
willyw
Revered One
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 1175
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sir_Fz wrote: | | willyw, I just tested it on my eggdrop using AllProtection4.6b9 and definitely when pnotil(punish) is set to 0:0 (or any other private flood setting for that matter), the script won't react on any private notice. However, in v4.6b8 that's not the case. Make sure you're using the latest version, that's all I can suggest since I made sure it's working correctly. |
I seemed to remember you recommended 4.6b9 to me, and that it was some time ago, at that. Found it mentioned here:
http://forum.egghelp.org/viewtopic.php?p=87383#87383
and:
in header of the script in use now, is:
I believe I downloaded from:
http://www.4shared.com/file/77031984/a1e1ddc9/allprotection46b9.html
but it has been a while.
Whatever modifications to it, have been as per your instructions in this thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
