| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Alchera Revered One

Joined: 11 Aug 2003 Posts: 3344 Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 3:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
If this is not being run on eggdrop 1.6.18 then I suggest you upgrade eggdrop and then do the following via DCC:
... see what happens. I have yet to encounter this error myself. _________________ Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sir_Fz Revered One

Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: Lebanon
|
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AllProtection won't consider 3 consecutive (not equal) lines as repeats. As for the time problem, it can be caused due to changes to date and time on your bot - restart your bot and it should be fixed. _________________ Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alchera Revered One

Joined: 11 Aug 2003 Posts: 3344 Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sir_Fz wrote: | | AllProtection won't consider 3 consecutive (not equal) lines as repeats. As for the time problem, it can be caused due to changes to date and time on your bot - restart your bot and it should be fixed. |
That particular user was using eggrop 1.6.17 and after chatting to them on IRC the problem seems to have been fixed [upgraded to 1.6.18].
A suggestion is to have information included specifying that the beta script requires eggdrop 1.6.18 and/or a version check via the script itself. _________________ Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sir_Fz Revered One

Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: Lebanon
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You're right, I don't know why I forgot to mention that this version works best with eggdrop1.6.18. But the problem that Zircon faced wasn't due to eggdrop's version, the command is the same on both versions; it was probably a problem from the box as I mentioned before. _________________ Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alchera Revered One

Joined: 11 Aug 2003 Posts: 3344 Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sir_Fz wrote: | | You're right, I don't know why I forgot to mention that this version works best with eggdrop1.6.18. But the problem that Zircon faced wasn't due to eggdrop's version, the command is the same on both versions; it was probably a problem from the box as I mentioned before. |
I should mention that Zircon is a French speaker and has a difficult time understanding English correctly.
When they return (on IRC) your post will be translated for him.
PS: Am glad that you agree about the version check.  _________________ Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sir_Fz Revered One

Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: Lebanon
|
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alright, I've been working on the script and did a few changes:
- Added the ability to add/rem drone exempts via the .ap:add/rem DCC commands.
- Fixed an unknown exploit caused by the string2list proc, replaced it with another.
- Added 2 extra ban types *!user@* and nick!*@*.
- Now you can exempt users from being banned for revolving door if they have specific part messages (set by you for exempting). This is usually used on networks where a user quits with a certain message when registered.
If you have any bug reports or suggestions not mentioned in the above list, it's time for you to speak for I won't be releasing any new version soon.
PS: The modified version has not been released yet, it's loaded on my bot for now. _________________ Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Domin Halfop

Joined: 10 Jun 2006 Posts: 72
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wouldt like a version/finger checker that couldt ban users if they have a wrong version/finger reply. _________________ Regards
Domin @ efnet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kash2k Voice

Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 18 Location: India
|
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I feel the best thing about the script is its -
Random String checker in nick and ident..
Wonderful work SIr_Fz |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sir_Fz Revered One

Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: Lebanon
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Current TODO list:
| Quote: | ### TODO
# * Bad version reply kick.
# * DCC cmd for private flood protection
# * Option to log everyday in a file |
This is all I've recieved lately, haven't found the time to implement yet. If you want to add anything to this list, it is time to speak. _________________ Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alchera Revered One

Joined: 11 Aug 2003 Posts: 3344 Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Suggestion:
The "bad" channel bit not only to scan on join but at intervals (user selected) with option for exempt as they presently are.
Users can enter and then join a "bad" channel after and be undetected. _________________ Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sir_Fz Revered One

Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: Lebanon
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Alchera wrote: | Suggestion:
The "bad" channel bit not only to scan on join but at intervals (user selected) with option for exempt as they presently are.
Users can enter and then join a "bad" channel after and be undetected. |
Good suggestion, the time interval (in minutes) can be set via DCC within the ap:bchans settings (0 to disable).
* Added to the TODO list. _________________ Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Domin Halfop

Joined: 10 Jun 2006 Posts: 72
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is it possible to make it multi bot, so it can interact with other bots on the same botnet, so if one bot is missing another takes over ??
Im thinking a bit like this:
bot1 normaly controls everything, but if bot1 for some reason is missing bot2 automaticly takes over?
Or is that something that shouldt be handled another way ?? _________________ Regards
Domin @ efnet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sir_Fz Revered One

Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793 Location: Lebanon
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
This can be implemented, but should take more time than the other options. I'll see what can be done, probably will implement it thanx for your suggestion. _________________ Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Domin Halfop

Joined: 10 Jun 2006 Posts: 72
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nice, thanks a lot for such a nice script  _________________ Regards
Domin @ efnet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
K3rN3L_P4nIC Voice

Joined: 17 Nov 2006 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
question: referring clones section of your script
it is possible to add exempts for one or more IPs/hosts? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|