| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sir_Fz
Revered One
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 3793
Location: Lebanon
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 8:15 am Post subject: |
 |
|
It already strips those. What exactly is happening?
_________________
Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bootdisk
Voice
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi there!
I have a question. Is there any way to make the DCC commands "public" and that the script is working 100% with quakenet service?
Im not a script ;S thats why im asking 
Thanks for a greate script |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sir_Fz
Revered One
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 3793
Location: Lebanon
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes it is possible, but I currently have no plans in implementing it. What do you want to do with Quakenet services?
_________________
Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bootdisk
Voice
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok nice. Like everything?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sir_Fz
Revered One
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 3793
Location: Lebanon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
X-Ception
Voice
Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 37
Location: Earth
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
bugs:
| Code: |
set c [string trimleft $c ":@%+"]
|
on some ircd's we also have *^ - not exactly a bug, just doesnt take it into account ?
secondly
on bchans i have a user being banned for being in the channel #
which is not listed as a bchan but is just banning him |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sir_Fz
Revered One
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 3793
Location: Lebanon
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alright, I'll add * and ^ in the next release (- too or no?). As for considering # a bad channel without it being listed, I doubt that - I don't see why it is being matched unless there is an entry which matches it in the bchans list.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
X-Ception
Voice
Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 37
Location: Earth
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sir_Fz wrote: | | Alright, I'll add * and ^ in the next release (- too or no?). As for considering # a bad channel without it being listed, I doubt that - I don't see why it is being matched unless there is an entry which matches it in the bchans list. |
def no entry and i had the user part # before rejoining the channel and was fine.
* = owner
^ = channel admin
not seen - used but ~ is used also if memory serves correct
as im somewhat sure you'll ask for it, from aplists
| Code: |
bchans global #[censored] #warlords #[censored]-you-ircops #side_by_side_bumsex #[censored]-you-chanops
|
There are no per channel bchans.
note: the censor is applied by the forums on the entry it is actually just the word lol and no, no brackets. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sir_Fz
Revered One
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 3793
Location: Lebanon
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you have the %rate displayed in the kick-reason, it should show the bad channel the user is on. Does it actually say it's #?
_________________
Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
X-Ception
Voice
Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 37
Location: Earth
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sir_Fz wrote: | | If you have the %rate displayed in the kick-reason, it should show the bad channel the user is on. Does it actually say it's #? |
I have this enabled but oddly it doesnt even report to dcc. I had to verify what the ban was for with .bans *!*@host to figure out why then going through the rooms we sussed it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sir_Fz
Revered One
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 3793
Location: Lebanon
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's displayed in the kick-message, and it also echos in the DCC when someone is on a bad channel. If this did not happen, then it's NOT an AllProtection issue.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub
- Opposing
Public Tcl scripts |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nsrafk
Halfop
Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 73
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey i have a question. Im running a botnet of 20 bots, and i have +enforcebans. I only load allprotection.tcl in 1 bot ofcourse. But when the bot, with allprotection.tcl detects something illegal, it sets +b, but then the user gets kicked by one of the other bots with kick reason "Banned".
Im running netbots on all my bots. Is it possible to load this script trough netbots?? Or another way of making the botnet share kickmessages?
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
speechles
Revered One
Joined: 26 Aug 2006
Posts: 1398
Location: emerald triangle, california (coastal redwoods)
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
The easiest way is to put the kick before the ban.
This way, user might get kicked twice; once by bot enforcing this script, then if they rejoin fast enough ( rejoin before you set the ban ) they get kicked again by fastest bot on your botnet. This is how I would attempt it anyways if it was that big an issue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zircon
Op
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 191
Location: Montreal
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
HI
In AllProtection script, the kick is put before the ban, and thats good.
However, for Undernet users, if the Bans are made through X, i suggest to put directly the ban, since X kicks automatically the abuser when it bans. The processus of banning will be then faster. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nsrafk
Halfop
Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 73
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | The easiest way is to put the kick before the ban.
This way, user might get kicked twice; once by bot enforcing this script, then if they rejoin fast enough ( rejoin before you set the ban ) they get kicked again by fastest bot on your botnet. This is how I would attempt it anyways if it was that big an issue. |
Well, the users who gets banned derserves to know what they've done wrong. Hard to undo mistakes, if they don't know what they did wrong, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
