egghelp.org community

comik · Voice Joined: 28 Jun 2007 Posts: 1

hi mr opposing,
i tried your allprotection.tcl but my bot report errors :
<(ce_juteqz> [17:27] Tcl error [btext:chars]: can't read "o": no such variable
<(ce_juteqz> [17:27] Tcl error [btext:line]: can't read "o": no such variable
<(ce_juteqz> [17:27] Tcl error [repeat:kick]: can't read "o": no such variable
<(ce_juteqz> [17:27] Tcl error [caps:kick]: can't read "p": no such variable
<(ce_juteqz> [17:27] Tcl error [text:char]: can't read "o": no such variable
<(ce_juteqz> [17:27] Tcl error [text:line]: can't read "o": no such variable
<(ce_juteqz> [17:27] Tcl error [btext:chars]: can't read "o": no such variable

what are the problems? thanks alot. Very Happy

_________________
newbie here

Sir_Fz · Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:17 pm Post subject:

You have invalid flood-settings, download a fresh copy and use the same template for settings (i.e. <offences>:<seconds>). Or you can try the new (beta) version 4.6b7.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts

silverboy · Halfop Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Posts: 55

Sir_Fz · Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 7:37 am Post subject:

What are your settings?
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts

silverboy · Halfop Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Posts: 55

<(shinko> ap:btextl: {15:7 mR-k lines.flood 60}
<(shinko> ap:btextc: {550:3 mR-k chars.flood 60}
<(shinko> ap:bnotcl: {4:2 mR-k lines.flood 60}
<(shinko> ap:bnotcc: {500:3 mR-k chars.flood 60}
<(shinko> ap:bctcp: {4:60 mR-k ctcp.flood 60}
<(shinko> ap:massjoin: {9:3 m 60}
<(shinko> ap:brevdoor: {3:7 mr 60}
<(shinko> ap:bpartmsg: {4:5 r 60}
<(shinko> ap:bnickf: {5:30 mR-k nick.flood 60}
<(shinko> ap:bcodes: {25:3 mr 60}
_________________
proxyz..proxyz...i see everywher... O_o

Sir_Fz · Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 8:53 pm Post subject:

I would assume that it's setting +m because that's the mode-lock for botnet join floods. I find it illogical for the script to putlog multiple botnet flood detections because that's NOT how the script is designed to work (this should never happen) unless someone is immediately removing the +m/r modes which immediately causes the protection to reset and detect again.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts

silverboy · Halfop Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Posts: 55

well nobody removed -m or -r. and it shud set +m on mass join right, but that was a BOTNET REVOLVING FLOOD RIGHT?.. so its supposed to +mr according to the settings but it did not?

one more Q...

# Your service's chanserv nick.
# example: set serv(nick) "ChanServ" or "PRIVMSG X@channels.undernet.org"
set serv(nick) "ChanServ"

do i need to give "X"

or "PRIVMSG X@channels.undernet.org" for bot to ban via X?
_________________
proxyz..proxyz...i see everywher... O_o

Sir_Fz · Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 7:12 am Post subject:

This setting is for using X (or whatever services) to deop users (for mass ban/kick/deop protections) and it should be edited accordingly to what is supported by your network. I guess /X is an invalid command on undernet and the write command is /msg X@channels.undernet.org .. so the correct setting would be "PRIVMSG X@channels.undernet.org" as for banning through X, edit the banthruX settings.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts

Domin · Halfop Joined: 10 Jun 2006 Posts: 72

Sir_Fz perhaps you shouldt include the slap protection script in this pack, it wouldt be a nice feature if one couldt set the functions like 2 slaps in a row = warn, 3 = kick 4 = ban and so on like all the other things the script does Smile

_________________
Regards
Domin @ efnet

Sir_Fz · Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 6:22 am Post subject:

You mean I should Razz

we'll see, I guess it's worth it...
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts

Domin · Halfop Joined: 10 Jun 2006 Posts: 72

Hehe yupp that was what i ment Smile

I wouldt love it, since i have a bunch of people that think its funny to continius slap each other, so it wouldt be a nice way of keeping it a bit down Cool

_________________
Regards
Domin @ efnet

samhain · Halfop Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 77

I recently used this tcl and I find it the best script I've ever used for my eggdrops... It was working fine months ago when I used the X ban option but now when I downloaded this script it doesn't work like that and it gives some errors
for example:

Sir_Fz · Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:18 am Post subject:

Perhaps you have a very high number for ban times set in your channel settings which exceed X's ban time limits?

Remember that ban-times are in minutes, AllProtection converts them to hours when banning through X.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts

samhain · Halfop Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 77

sir I have set %bantime to 1 for every protection feature.. it means the ban hour is 1 for every ban?

Sir_Fz · Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:41 am Post subject:

1 means 1 minute, but that should not be a problem since the bot will send 0 as a ban-time (should cause no errors on X as I recall). If you want a 1-hour-ban then use 60.

Edit: If you meant that you replaced %bantime with 1 in the banthruX(cmd) variable, then this means that the bot will always send 1 (1 hour) as ban time for ALL offences. I recommend not to change this, you won't have control over the ban time if you limit it to 1 here.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts