egghelp.org community

Sir_Fz · Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:43 am Post subject:

Are you sure that the version reply of that user contains the keyword "X script"? if so, then this can be a possible bug and I'll try to look into it and fix it.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts

elisca · Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 4:16 pm Post subject:

i'm sure about it, hmm for valid result maybe the other's member that they use AllProt could try it and report their result too.. Very Happy

Sir_Fz · Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:16 am Post subject:

Do you have VERSION added to the ap:ctcpchecks channel-setting? Also, make sure that you do not have a channel-specific bctcrs list (since you're adding to the global bctcrs list). I've looked into the code and didn't find anything that should keep it from functioning as intended. Unfortunately I do not have an Eggdrop to test it myself so I have to rely on users' reviews (anyone else experiencing the same problem?).

And one more thing, are you seeing the VERSION reply in your bot's partyline?
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts

elisca · Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:14 am Post subject:

yes, I have added VERSION on the ap:ctcpchecks channel-setting
i'm not use channel-specific for bctcrs list, i'm use it for global.

yes, bot could recognize and make VERSION reply on my partyline..

anyone have a same problem with me ?

Zircon · Op Joined: 21 Aug 2006 Posts: 191 Location: Montreal

I tested it as a FINGER, and it s working for me. Elisca, can you test it as a FINGER ?

Sir_Fz · Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 4:50 pm Post subject:

Zircon · Op Joined: 21 Aug 2006 Posts: 191 Location: Montreal

Hello Sir_Fz

I made a test for VERSION. The bot sends the CTCP VERSION, and it receives an aswer in thi form :

<Anti-Flood> [02:22] CTCP reply VERSION: mIRC v6.16 Khaled Mardam-Bey from TeeesssT (~TEST@70.53.153.159) to Anti-Flood
<Anti-Flood> [02:22] CTCP reply VERSION: X script from TeeesssT (~TEST70.53.153.159) to Anti-Flood

and it doesnt ban. I think the problem is that the answer is in 2 lines.

Sir_Fz · Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 6:51 am Post subject:

You're correct, the bot will react on the first version-reply from the user and ignore the second line. I'll see what I can do to make a workaround for this.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts

elisca · Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:34 pm Post subject:

Knight · Voice Joined: 17 Mar 2007 Posts: 1

as so many people been asking for the silence feature integrated in AllProtection:

find this :

set apfp(rmode) R

replace with :

set apfp(rmode) "1"

you can set the silence/ignore time here , as much duration you want :

set apfp(rtime) 120

set apfp(itime) 120

Next you find "rmode" in the tcl and you see this :

Sir_Fz · Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:03 pm Post subject:

Thanks for your temporary tweak, I'll make sure this is integrated in my next release.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts

eXtremer · Op Joined: 07 May 2008 Posts: 138

Does Allprotection have !public commands ?
for example to turn on/off a feature like badwords ?
!disable badwords

Alchera · Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 7:35 am Post subject:

halloaizq · Voice Joined: 27 Aug 2007 Posts: 24

I got this msg error
:AllProtection::parts adv]: unmatched open quote in list

im using allprotection4.6b8.tcl .. so how to edit this command??
#
## 8-9 ## Swearing/Advertising in part/quit messages
#
# Exampl: "s:1 a:1" Enables banning of users with part/quit msgs containing swear/advertisement
lappend ap:udefs {ap:pqsadv "s:1 a:1"}
_________________
: halloaizq :

Sir_Fz