egghelp.org community

[e-force]

Is there any option to exempt a hostname from join flood, like an example? I have searched for option like this, but nothing found. Am i miss this option, or there is no way to exclude some host from join flood check?

[Sir_Fz]

There's no option to specifically exempt users from join-flood only, however you can add users as +f on your bot which will exempt them from all protections.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts

[e-force]

This does not work for me, but your replay was helpful. Thanks!

[Sir_Fz]

Perhaps I'll integrate some exemption feature that is independent for every offense; it's on the to-do list now
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts

[Casey952]

thank you so much Sir_Fz for the ban first then kick. You could add it to the next beta.

[Danik]

I can't find out the bad words list, how to add bad words to the egg ?

[Sir_Fz]

If you actually read the header of the script you would've noticed this

[Ikaa]

The 4shared link for 4.6.9b seems to be non functional. Is there a mirror? I love this script.

[cache]

[Ikaa]

doesnt work for me. I click it, hit download, wait 10 seconds, click the next link, and it tells me it invalid.

removed link. replaced by official upload

4.6b9 is a huge improvement over 4.5 i like the simplicity in the newer version. also had problems recognizing control codes with 4.5

[Sir_Fz]

Strange, the link is correct but it seems 4shared have something wrong with their system. Anyway, I uploaded it on megaupload, get it from here.
_________________
Follow me on GitHub

- Opposing

Public Tcl scripts

[Lupo]

I've been gladly using your script for a while now as it must be the most complete script for eggdrop out there, but recently i've been getting the following error on an attempt of action :

Tcl error [adv:kick]: expected integer but got ""

I got the same for all kicks and kickbans.

I'm using eggdrop 1.6.19 and the latest tcl installed.

Any help to solve this would be greatly appreciated.

EDIT : i have this both with version 4.5 and 4.6b9

[entropy]

Excellent all-around protection script. Thanks!

In my testing, I noticed that +v users on the bot are exempt if they happen to trigger an actionable event (like repeat lines), just like +o users are.

The channel I run this script in has many voiced users due to the way we try to limit abuse (+m chan, everybody gets auto voiced after 20s. We then blacklist abusers so they don't get the auto voice). This helps with fly-by spam and a number of other issues.

I was wondering if theres an easy way to set which user flags will be exempt from action if they trigger one of the settings, and which will be subject to it. I looked through the source but couldn't easily locate where you're doing your if/match.

Maybe in future versions this would be useful as a knob users can configure?

ie> ap:protectedusers omn

to make all non op/master/owner users subject to the protection settings?

Maybe even for more granular settings

ap:protectedusersglobal
ap:protecteduserschan

to protect users by global flags and per channel flags. If something like this existed I could easily enforce my protections on auto voiced users where it doesn't appear that I can now. Just a suggestion

Best protection script available, nice work!


On a side note, it looks like the new version number didn't make it into the loaded/unloaded messages. It still says v4.6b8.

[Sir_Fz]

[entropy]